Record Details

Title A Reviewed Hydrogeothermal Evaluation of the ÄŽurkov Depression Hydrogeothermal Structure: Insights from Probabilistic Assessment and Sustainable Production Optimization
Authors Branislav FRICOVSKY, Ladislav VIZI, Klement FORDINAL, Radovan CERNAK, Daniel MARCIN
Year 2019
Conference Stanford Geothermal Workshop
Keywords geothermal evaluation, volumetric method, recovery facrot, ÄŽurkov depression, Slovakia
Abstract Although geothermal structure of the ÄŽurkov depression is by many considered the most prospective for a large-scale direct geothermal energy production, no project has been launched yet at the site. Revision of hydrogeothermal evaluation took part to introduce a concept of probability-based assessment and sustainable production into a topic. Both, a conservative t = 40 years and t = 100 years balance period has been quantified, the latter corresponding to a minimum production period meeting sustainability concept as defined by Axelsson et al. in 2001. Combination of specified recovery factor based on a production-efficiency method, volumetric (heat-in-place) USGS method and reserve capacity ratio approach has been applied to both, Monte Carlo based quantification and Turning-bands derived spatial distribution of energy base. According to 10,000 iterations, the median for HT = 5.8 EJ. At calculated R0 = 0.053, the mean value of H0 = 305 PJ. Following the booking concept, P90(H0) = Rpv = 37 MWt for tprod = 100 years and P90(H0) = Rpv = 92 MWt when balanced for 30 years only. This leaves Rpb = 60 MWt or Rpb = 150 MWt to prove under a probabilistic concept (50 % probability). However, the modified reserve capacity ratio yields a critical limit of Pth = 49 MWt and Pth = 121 MWt respectively, if turning to a sustainable geothermal production. With a reference to a pioneering hydrogeothermal evaluation, 42 MWt were proven through free-flow and 92 MWt modeled for pumping. To quantify the first, it appears that as long as a model is valid, there is 88 % probability of a long-term production at a given rate even balanced for 100 years. For both periods, the resultant reserve capacity ratio for such an installed capacity would count rcap = 0.58 and rcap = 0.83 respectively, implying a sustainable character of the production.
Back to Results Download File