Record Details

Title Hydraulic Fracturing Experiments in a Deep Mine at 1500 m Depth: Results from the kISMET Project
Authors Curtis M. OLDENBURG, Patrick F. DOBSON, and The kISMET team
Year 2017
Conference Stanford Geothermal Workshop
Keywords EGS, stress, deep mine, hydraulic fracturing, fractures
Abstract In support of the U.S. DOE SubTER Crosscut initiative, we established a field test facility in a deep mine and designed and carried out in situ hydraulic fracturing experiments relevant to enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) in crystalline rock to characterize the stress field, understand the effects of rock fabric on fracturing, and gain experience in monitoring using geophysical methods. The project also included pre- and post-fracturing simulation and analysis, and laboratory measurements and experiments. The kISMET (permeability (k) and Induced Seismicity Management for Energy Technologies) site was established in the West Access Drift of the Sanford Underground Research Facility (SURF) 4757 ft (1450 m) below ground (on the 4850 ft level (4850L)) in phyllite of the Precambrian Poorman Formation. We drilled and continuously cored five near-vertical boreholes in a line on 3 m (10 ft) spacing, deviating the two outermost boreholes slightly to create a five-spot pattern around the test borehole centered in the test volume 40 m below the drift invert (floor) at a total depth of ~1490 m (4890 ft). Laboratory measurements of core from the center test borehole showed P-wave velocity heterogeneity along each core indicating strong, fine-scale (~1 cm or smaller) changes in the mechanical properties of the rock. Field measurements of the stress field by hydraulic fracturing showed that the minimum horizontal stress at the kISMET site averages 21.7 MPa (3146 psi) trending approximately N-S (356 degrees azimuth) and plunging slightly NNW at 12°. The vertical and horizontal maximum stresses are similar in magnitude at 42-44 MPa (6090-6380 psi) for the depths of testing, which averaged approximately 1530 m (5030 ft). Hydraulic fractures were remarkably uniform suggesting core-scale and larger rock fabric did not play a role in controlling fracture orientation. Analytical solutions suggest that the fracture radius of the large fracture (stimulation test) was more than 6 m (20 ft), depending on the unknown amount of leak-off. *kISMET team: Yuxin WU, Paul J. COOK, Timothy J. KNEAFSEY, Seiji NAKAGAWA, Drew L. SILER, Craig ULRICH, Jonathan AJO-FRANKLIN, Jonny RUTQVIST, Herb F. WANG, Bezalel C. HAIMSON, Thomas W. DOE, Hiroki SONE, Peter VIGILANTE, Mark D. ZOBACK, William M. ROGGENTHEN, Moo Y. LEE, Mathew INGRAHAM, Earl D. MATTSON, Hai HUANG, Timothy J. JOHNSON, Jaret HEISE, Thomas M. DALEY, Jens T. BIRKHOLZER, Yves GUGLIELMI, Paul A. JOHNSON, David D. COBLENTZ, Joseph P. MORRIS, and Joshua A. WHITE
Back to Results Download File