| Title | Risk Mitigation Systems in Comparison |
|---|---|
| Authors | Imolauer, K; Ueltzen, M |
| Year | 2016 |
| Conference | European Geothermal Congress |
| Keywords | Risk Mitigation, Venture Capital, Early Stage |
| Abstract | All particular fund systems follow the same objective: to lower the necessity of venture capital placement (financed from equity) in the early stages, which consequently enables projects to be developed and due interest reduction have a decreasing effect on LCOE (levelized costs of electricity). Hence, they impact the competitiveness of geothermal power generation in relation to alternative generation technologies and enable in particular the development of projects at all. Furthermore, projects with a less advantageous risk-reward-ratio (e.g. heat supply projects on medium or low enthalpy resources) face significant financing problems during the early stages which can only be financed by venture capital. The expected outcome or profitability of such projects - taken the connected risk into consideration - will hardly lead to a placement of venture capital. A public fund system therefore takes the burden of early stage exploration or discovery risks and stimulates the market for geothermal projects and consequently leverages the investment in geothermal based infrastructure. |