| Abstract |
Over the past decade research has greatly advanced our understanding of structurally controlled geothermal systems and the potential for “deep stratigraphic reservoirs” in the Great Basin region, western USA. For example, studies have shown that structurally controlled geothermal systems are associated with specific structural settings, such as terminations of major normal faults, accommodation zones, pull-aparts in strike-slip faults, displacement transfer zones, or step-overs in range-front faults. However, we know that not every structure (e.g., termination of a major normal fault or step-over in a range-front fault) hosts an active geothermal system. Recent research has also shown that regional strain rate model as determined from GPS geodesy, the composition of that strain (extensional versus shear or compressive strain), recency of Quaternary faulting, and slip and dilation tendency of faults correlate positively with the distribution of both high and low-temperature, structurally controlled geothermal systems within the Great Basin. Combining these strain data and fault slip history data sets with existing temperature gradient data, heat flow data, spring temperatures, fluid geothermometry, and geophysical data provides an effective platform for evaluating the geothermal potential of respective structural plays. Recent studies focused on deep stratigraphic reservoirs indicate the best conditions for economically viable development are associated with thick sedimentary basins with low-thermal-conductivity sedimentary cap rocks overlying permeable host rocks (e.g. carbonates) and co-located with areas of high heat flow. Some of the factors that contribute to the potential for deep stratigraphic reservoirs and conventional structurally controlled geothermal systems apply to both types of resources, and in some places the potential for these two types of resources overlap in space, suggesting the potential for hybrid reservoirs (structurally controlled deep stratigraphic reservoirs). Effective and complete evaluation of geothermal potential in the Great Basin should include parameters that cover both types of resources. In this study, two areas with a combined area of 26,000 km2 were evaluated for geothermal resource potential, equating to |